This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Grey, I. M. Articles by Barnes-Holmes, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Grey, I. M. Articles by Barnes-Holmes, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Staff Attributions about the Causes of Challenging Behaviours

Effects of Longitudinal Training in Multi-Element Behaviour Support

Trinity College, Dublin, and Stewarts Hospital Services, Dublin, Ireland

Brian McClean

Brothers of Charity, Roscommon, Ireland

Dermot Barnes-Holmes

National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland

Staff attributions for challenging behaviour are purported to relate to staff responses to such behaviour. To elucidate this relationship, much recent work has relied on eliciting staff attributions to written descriptions of a client engaging in challenging behaviour. However, current attribution theory suggests that eliciting attributions in relation to written descriptions is likely to be qualitatively different from attributions to known clients with challenging behaviour. Thirty-four staff completed the Challenging Behaviour Attribution Scale (CHABA) with respect to a client with whom they worked before, during and after completing a longitudinal course in assessment and intervention for challenging behaviour. Significantly more staff attributed challenging behaviour to negative reinforcement and self-stimulation after training. There was a significant reduction in the number of staff attributing challenging behaviour to positive reinforcement after training. However, a number of deficiencies in the CHABA were identified which may render interpretations inconclusive.

Key Words: attributions • challenging behaviour • staff training

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 6, No. 3, 297-312 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1469004702006003037


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Williams and J. L. Rose The development of a questionnaire to assess the perceptions of care staff towards people with intellectual disabilities who display challenging behaviour J Intellect Disabil., June 1, 2007; 11(2): 197 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Snow, P. E. Langdon, and S. Reynolds Care staff attributions toward self-injurious behaviour exhibited by adults with intellectual disabilities J Intellect Disabil., March 1, 2007; 11(1): 47 - 63. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Stevens Moral Positioning: Service User Experiences of Challenging Behaviour in Learning Disability Services Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2006; 36(6): 955 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Mccausland, I. M. Grey, G. Wester, and B. McClean Effects of functional versus non-functional explanations for challenging behaviours on treatment acceptability J Intellect Disabil., December 1, 2004; 8(4): 351 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. O Rourke, I. M. Grey, R. Fuller, and B. Mcclean Satisfaction with Living Arrangements of Older Adults with Intellectual Disability: Service Users' and Carers' Views J Intellect Disabil., March 1, 2004; 8(1): 12 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]