This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Malin, N. A. Articles by Wilmot, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Malin, N. A. Articles by Wilmot, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Ethical Advisory Group in a Learning Disability Service

What They Talk about

University of Sunderland, UK

Stephen Wilmot

University of Derby, UK

This is the second of three papers reporting on a study of the work of an ethical advisory group working within a learning disability service. The part of the study reported in this paper sets out to investigate the ethical content of the group's output by studying the content of its discussions, and its processes of decision-making and conflict management. Three consecutive meetings of the group were recorded and observed. Also, individual members were interviewed. Meeting transcripts were subjected to a qualitative analysis. This revealed that a wide range of ethics-related concepts were articulated in the meetings, and a productive balance seemed to be achieved between conflicting principles. The major tension was between the ethics of care and protection, and the ethics of autonomy. The concept of duty was only expressed in the context of the duty of care, and the ethics of character and virtue were absent, perhaps justifiably. Overt conflict was almost entirely absent, and probably for this reason opinions were sometimes expressed without supporting argument. However the conflict of principles supplied the element of controversy recommended in the literature. The group also showed a willingness to subject its parent organization's actions to ethical analysis.

Key Words: advisory group • conflict of principles • decision-making • duty • ethics

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 4, No. 3, 217-226 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/146900470000400304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Burke Listening to young people with special needs: The influence of group activities J Intellect Disabil., December 1, 2005; 9(4): 359 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Grant User Involvement, Empowerment and Research J Intellect Disabil., June 1, 2001; 5(2): 91 - 95. [PDF]

				N. A. Malin and S. Wilmot An Ethical Advisory Group in a Learning Disability Service: Members'views on outcomes J Intellect Disabil., December 1, 2000; 4(4): 333 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]