Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, G.
Right arrow Articles by Warwick, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martin, G.
Right arrow Articles by Warwick, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluation of a Nurse Led Annual Review of Patients with Severe Intellectual Disabilities, Needs Identified and Needs Met, in a Large Group Practice

Graham Martin

Red Roofs Surgery, Nuneaton, Warwickshiregraham-martin{at}redroofs31.freeserve.co.uk

Lynn Philip

Louise Bates

North Warwickshire Primary Care Trust

Jenny Warwick

Red Roofs Surgery, Nuneaton, Warwickshire

A learning disabilities nurse led health review, with doctor backup, was offered to patients with learning disabilities during 2002 in a large general practice. Prior to the check, patients completed an agenda sheet. During the check, the nurse discussed issues with patient and carer and completed a structured questionnaire. Patient and carer were then seen by doctor and nurse and the implementation sheet was completed. Fifty-three patients attended, an uptake of 91 percent. Of these patients and their carers, 34 percent recorded agendas/concerns. The nurse/GP questionnaire identified further interventions in 62 percent. A total of 79 interventions were identified, an average of 1.49 per patient attendance. At 3 months, 84 percent of patients with patient/carer generated, and 88 percent of patients with clinician generated interventions, had had one or more actions implemented. The check met the majority of identified unmet health needs in these adults with learning disabilities. Annual checks will continue to be offered.

Key Words: annual health check • health check questionnaire • patient/carer agenda • patients with learning disabilities

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 8, No. 3, 235-246 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1469004704044965


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intellect DisabilHome page
R. Jenkins and R. Davies
Neglect of people with intellectual disabilities: A failure to act?
J Intellect Disabil., March 1, 2006; 10(1): 35 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]