Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mcnally, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mcnally, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Survey of Self-Advocacy Groups for People with Learning Disabilities in an English Region

Part II

Steve Mcnally

Oxford Brookes University, UK Oxfordshire Learning Disability NHS Trust, UK

This is the second article on the development, implementation and analysis of a survey of self-advocacy groups for people with learning disabilities in the midlands region of England. One hundred questionnaires were posted to groups and 53 were completed — a good response for remote work with groups whose members may not read. In postal surveys non-response can be overestimated because ineligible or unreachable respondents may be regarded as refusals. Three respondents identified themselves as ineligible; therefore the response rate was no less than 54 percent. Groups provided information about their origins, structure and functioning. Among the key findings were the consistency of the issues identified as important, and the willingness to engage in research. The overwhelming majority of groups indicated that they would participate further in the project. Participatory research paradigms from the social model of disability can enhance our understanding of self-advocates' experience.

Key Words: findings • participatory research • questionnaire • themes • typology

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 7, No. 3, 231-249 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/14690047030073004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?