Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNally, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McNally, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Survey of Self-Advocacy Groups for People with Learning Disabilities in an English Region

Steve McNally

Oxford Brookes University, UK

This is the first of two articles which report the rationale for and the planning, execution and analysis of a postal survey of self-advocacy groups in the English midlands. It considers some key literature on previous studies of self-advocacy groups. Ethical considerations including informed consent and confidentiality are explored. The researcher gained approval from various research ethics committees in the planning of the study. It is important that approval was secured prior to gathering data from potentially vulnerable individuals. This may be seen as paradoxical because a cornerstone of the self-advocacy movement is for people to make their own choices and decisions, including informed consent to participate in a research project. This article discusses the design and piloting of an illustrated questionnaire and letter of invitation to participate in the study. Methodological issues in conducting out-research, including remote postal work, with people with learning disabilities are also examined.

Key Words: ethical approval • methodological issues • self-advocacy groups • survey

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 6, No. 2, 185-199 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/146900470200600207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intellect DisabilHome page
S. Mcnally
A Survey of Self-Advocacy Groups for People with Learning Disabilities in an English Region: Part II
J Intellect Disabil., September 1, 2003; 7(3): 231 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]