Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fish, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fish, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Working with People Who Harm Themselves in a Forensic Learning Disability Service

Experiences of Direct Care Staff

Rebecca M. Fish

Calderstones NHS Trust, UK

This paper provides feedback from research with staff who work with people who self-harm in a medium secure learning disability service in the north-west of England. It outlines some of the experiences described by staff, as well as personal and organizational responses to incidents of self-harm; explanations that staff use to understand the behaviour; and recommendations for change to treatment models and the staff support system. The information was gained using in-depth interviews, within a participatory research framework. Staff reported experiencing powerful emotional responses to incidents of self-harm, ranging from feelings of anger to feelings of inadequacy and guilt. A number of explanatory models were used by participants to understand the behaviour, and these were generally carefully considered and related to the client's individual situation. The staff/client relationship was often reported as being very rewarding but sometimes staff felt the client was manipulating them. This raised issues about the balance between client autonomy and risk, which was a concern for all staff. When discussing support needs, participants commented that there should be more training that they are able to use in practice, and that more support is needed in the form of discussion groups with colleagues. The findings from this study may be relevant to similar residential facilities.

Key Words: autonomy • emotional response • guilt • self-harm • staff

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 4, No. 3, 193-207 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/146900470000400302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?