Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Learning disability and advocacy: obstacles to client empowerment

R. Jackson

Citizen advocacy, with its aim to empower, has the potential to transform the lives of people with learning disabilities, but an inevitable consequence of client empowerment is professional disempowerment. Professional workers are unlikely to relinquish power, control and influence without some resistance. As this paper seeks to show there are a number of ways for statutory agencies to neutralize the effect of citizen advocacy. If this challenge is to be met then a number of radical changes need to be made in the way advocacy programmes operate: the volunteering principle should be abandoned; full-time advocates should be appointed; generic rather than specialist advocacy services should be established; and, in order to protect the operational independence of advocacy programmes, funding should come from central and not local government sources. If the kind of fundamental changes, proposed in this paper, are not introduced then the credibility of advocacy services will be irretrievably damaged with the result that people with learning disabilities will continue to remain disadvantaged. If people with learning disabilities are to be empowered they need strong, independent, informed and expert representation.

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 3, No. 1, 50-55 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/146900479900300108
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?